{"id":637,"date":"2022-05-08T14:50:34","date_gmt":"2022-05-08T04:50:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sysmit.com\/cf22\/?p=637"},"modified":"2023-12-13T15:28:02","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13T05:28:02","slug":"postmortems-software-outages-psychological-safety","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sysmit.com\/cf22\/postmortems-software-outages-psychological-safety\/","title":{"rendered":"Renaming “post-mortems” of software outages for psychological safety"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
As a generative leader and mental health advocate, I am wary of seeing such a morbid term being thrown around for what should be a learning experience that advances culture.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n This post will differ from my usual positive posts about Site Reliability Engineering (SRE). Please bear with this because I\u2019m an otherwise forward thinker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two issues I have with the term\u00a0post-mortem<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let\u2019s unpack this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Imagine being a new SRE and hearing all these fascinating terms like SLOs, observability, APM, Chaos Engineering, etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then a term \u2014 typically reserved for\u00a0gritty crime dramas \u2014 makes its way into the SRE lingo<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe are doing a post-mortem on yesterday\u2019s outage\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A what? You and I know what it means: figuring out what went wrong after an outage or performance degradation event in the production software system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But let\u2019s consider others for a second.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It\u2019s a ghastly connotation for people who are averse to negative metaphors. Even more for those mentally scarred from seeing post-mortem scenes on TV. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, they exist, but many will not be vocal about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I can understand the term\u2019s origins. A lot of my friends are pure engineers and many of them have a sense of dark humor that they use to shock and delight each other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But Site Reliability Engineering spans well beyond the figurative IT basement<\/strong>. It has begun to draw in diverse \u2014 in particular, neurodiverse \u2014 talent. Do we need to have lingo like this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n The other issue I have with this term is that it can risk your job in companies that don\u2019t practice \u2014 and likely never will \u2014 a\u00a0Westrum generative culture<\/a>\u00a0as outlined by Humble et al. in their book,\u00a0Accelerate<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A generative culture of accepting failure will not translate well to companies where I\u2019ve seen managers chastise people for unavoidable mistakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n